<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Very good FED TV &#124; Field Emission display demo video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fed-tv-reviews.com/very-good-fed-tv-field-emission-display-demo-video/2008/07/26/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fed-tv-reviews.com/very-good-fed-tv-field-emission-display-demo-video/2008/07/26/</link>
	<description>FED TV &#124; Field Emission Display Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bartisimpson</title>
		<link>http://www.fed-tv-reviews.com/very-good-fed-tv-field-emission-display-demo-video/2008/07/26/comment-page-1/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>bartisimpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fed-tv-reviews.com/?p=49#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>Sony please make the 3D TV based on FED technology. The LED FHD3D is wrong way. Panasonic 65&quot; REAL FULLHD 3D is better than your&#039;s &amp; Samsung&#039;s LED 3D TV. Don&#039;t &quot;LED&quot; 3D :-D. 240Hz of FED is more compatible for 3D (120 real Hz per each eye). Come back to FED and make 100&quot; FED REAL 3D TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony please make the 3D TV based on FED technology. The LED FHD3D is wrong way. Panasonic 65&#8243; REAL FULLHD 3D is better than your&#8217;s &amp; Samsung&#8217;s LED 3D TV. Don&#8217;t &#8220;LED&#8221; 3D <img src='http://www.fed-tv-reviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> . 240Hz of FED is more compatible for 3D (120 real Hz per each eye). Come back to FED and make 100&#8243; FED REAL 3D TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carl</title>
		<link>http://www.fed-tv-reviews.com/very-good-fed-tv-field-emission-display-demo-video/2008/07/26/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fed-tv-reviews.com/?p=49#comment-680</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s better than plazma, SONY is wrong to not sell it to consumers as soon as possible. If companies are selling 65 in. Tvs, then fed should be available now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s better than plazma, SONY is wrong to not sell it to consumers as soon as possible. If companies are selling 65 in. Tvs, then fed should be available now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

